-
A special audit identified deficiencies in the previous management of Eesti Energia AS
We conducted a special audit of Eesti Energia and its subsidiaries, commissioned by the Ministry of Finance. Four areas were analysed, and 37 observations were made. “We monitored the implementation of actions agreed upon in internal audits. To do this, we analysed documents, as well as explanations provided to us separately, and information obtained during […]
-
We represented the Estonian Handball Association during arbitration regarding disputes related to disciplinary penalties
We provided assistance to the Estonian Handball Association in a dispute with handball club HC Tallinn. We are pleased that we were able to assist the association in the best possible way and to successfully represent the client in the ensuing disputes. Within a short period of time, the federation received two complaints and a […]
-
We are advising Finnish and Estonian energy companies on obtaining insurance compensation as a result of the damage to the Balticconnector gas pipeline
We are advising Gasgrid Finland Oy and Elering AS on obtaining insurance compensation for the damaged Balticconnector gas pipeline. In October 2023, the Chinese vessel NewNew Polar Bear damaged the Balticconnector gas pipeline between Estonia and Finland. As a result, Finland’s gas connection with Europe was disrupted, causing approximately EUR 35 million in damage. We […]
-
Marabu claims EUR 9.5 million in damages from Nordica
We are representing the Estonian startup airline Marabu Airlines in a significant legal dispute with the Estonian national airline Nordic Aviation Group, relating to the Estonian aviation market. Nordica violates ACMI agreement In 2023, Marabu and Nordica entered into an ACMI (aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance) agreement, under which Nordica promised to use three Airbus […]
-
The General Court of the European Union granted an interim relief application
We represent a client in a dispute with the European Commission before the General Court of the European Union. The core of the dispute revolves around the Commission’s decision to exclude the client from a procurement procedure, deeming their bid unacceptable. According to the Commission, the client’s proposal did not meet the minimum requirements. The […]